DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 or Deutz (KHD) Intrac 2002?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6250 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Intrac 2002 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (300 kg / 661 lb) more three-point lift.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6250 | Intrac 2002 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 37.5 kW (50.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | 37.3 kW (50.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6250 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Intrac 2002 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6250 and the Intrac 2002. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6250 and the Intrac 2002. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 43.9 L/min (11.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 has 14% more lift (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Deutz Intrac 2002 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,730 kg (6,019 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | 2,680 kg (5,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | — | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6250 and the Intrac 2002. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Deutz Intrac 2002 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6250” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986–1990 | 1972–1974 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 has 14% more lift (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Deutz Intrac 2002 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Deutz Intrac 2002 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6250 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6250 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Intrac 2002 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, forward gears and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources