Claas Xerion 3800 or New Holland T 8050?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Xerion 3800 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 8050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Xerion 3800 | T 8050 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 253 kW (339 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800” | 239 kW (321 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xerion 3800 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 8050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Xerion 3800 and the T 8050. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Xerion 3800 and the T 8050. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 166.6 L/min (44.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Xerion 3800. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 11,700 kg (25,794 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800” | 10,203 kg (22,494 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Xerion 3800: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800”); the T 8050: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 10,200 kg (22,487 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800” | 11,008 kg (24,268 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Xerion 3800. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800” | 19 to 23 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Claas Xerion 3800 is stepless (CVT) and the New Holland T 8050 has 19 to 23 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Xerion 3800 and the T 8050. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | AheadThe New Holland T 8050 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Claas Xerion 3800 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Xerion 3800. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2007–2013 | 2007–2011 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland T 8050 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Claas Xerion 3800 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Claas Xerion 3800 is stepless (CVT) and the New Holland T 8050 has 19 to 23 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xerion 3800 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 8050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Xerion 3800: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Xerion 3800”); the T 8050: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T8050”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources