Claas Celtis 426 vs Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A)
4 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (4WD; 2WD / 4WD); they were not built in overlapping years (2003–2008; 1993–1995). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
4 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Celtis 426 | MF 3055 (A) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 74 hp | 74 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | Perkins A 4.248 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 4.07 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 209 lb·ft · 283 N·m | 209 lb·ft · 283 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +33% Celtis 426 |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 18.2 gpm · 69 L/min | 13.2 gpm · 50.0 L/min | +38% Celtis 426 |
| Pressure declared | 2,611 psi · 180 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 8,940 lb · 4,055 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 8,223 lb · 3,730 kg | 8,598 lb · 3,900 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 98.0 in · 2,489 mm | 93.3 in · 2,371 mm | — |
| Length declared | 149.8 in · 3,805 mm | 160.2 in · 4,070 mm | +7% MF 3055 (A) |
| Width declared | 98.8 in · 2,510 mm | 80.7 in · 2,049 mm | +22% Celtis 426 |
| Height declared | 102.5 in · 2,604 mm | 105.1 in · 2,670 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.0 in · 380 mm | 14.6 in · 370 mm | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 153.2 qt · 145 L | 156.4 qt · 148.0 L | — |
Claas Celtis 426 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 426”
- Source: OECD test report 2219, 2005
Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 178”