Case-Steyr M 975 a or Hürlimann H-76 XA?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the M 975 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-Steyr M 975 a suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 30% (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | M 975 a | H-76 XA | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55 kW (74 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 54.4 kW (73.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 975 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 975 a and the H-76 XA. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 975 a and the H-76 XA. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.4 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | AheadThe Case-Steyr M 975 a has 30% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the M 975 a. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,100 kg (6,834 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-Steyr M 975 a is 15% heavier (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the M 975 a. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 20 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 975 a. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 975 a and the H-76 XA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2004 | 2005–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-76 XA is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-Steyr M 975 a has 30% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-Steyr M 975 a is 15% heavier (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-76 XA is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 975 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources