CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) or Volvo T 700 (Volvo)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 995 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Volvo T 700 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (316 kg / 697 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) and Volvo T 700 (Volvo), with the call on each
Question995 (DT)T 700Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 995 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 995 (DT) and the T 700.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 995 (DT) and the T 700.
Which pumps more oil for implements?35.5 L/min (9.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 995 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”2,743 kg (6,047 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”AheadThe Volvo T 700 has 13% more lift (316 kg / 697 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,964 kg (6,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Volvo T 700 is 40% heavier (1,186 kg / 2,615 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 995 (DT) and the T 700.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”16Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 995 (DT) and the T 700.
Which is faster on the road?35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Volvo T 700 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Volvo T 700 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T 700.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 700”AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Volvo T 700 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19931976–1982Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Volvo T 700 has 13% more lift (316 kg / 697 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Volvo T 700 is 40% heavier (1,186 kg / 2,615 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Volvo T 700 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Volvo T 700 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Volvo T 700 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 995 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources