CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 995 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 44% (1,060 kg / 2,338 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 995 (DT) | MF 6140 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 995 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 995 (DT) and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 995 (DT) and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 51.5 L/min (13.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 995 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | 3,487 kg (7,688 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 44% more lift (1,060 kg / 2,338 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,964 kg (6,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | 3,660 kg (8,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) is 23% heavier (696 kg / 1,534 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 995 (DT) and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 995 (DT) and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 995” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1993 | 1995–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 44% more lift (1,060 kg / 2,338 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) is 23% heavier (696 kg / 1,534 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 995 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 995 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources