CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) or Hürlimann H-658 XA?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 895 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-658 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) and Hürlimann H-658 XA, with the call on each
Question895 (DT)H-658 XACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?61 kW (82 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”61 kW (82 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 895 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-658 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 895 (DT) and the H-658 XA.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 895 (DT) and the H-658 XA.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 895 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”2,692 kg (5,935 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 895 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”); the H-658 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,113 kg (6,863 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) is 17% heavier (453 kg / 999 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 895 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”AheadThe Hürlimann H-658 XA has 181% more forward gears (29 gears) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 895 (DT) and the H-658 XA.
Which is faster on the road?35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-658 XA.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19932000–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-658 XA is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) is 17% heavier (453 kg / 999 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-658 XA has 181% more forward gears (29 gears) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-658 XA is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 895 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-658 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 895 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895”); the H-658 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources