CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) or John Deere 5500 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 695 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5500 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 41% (702 kg / 1,548 lb) more three-point lift.
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 695 (DT) | 5500 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 53.7 kW (72.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 53.7 kW (72.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 695 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5500 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 695 (DT) and the 5500 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 695 (DT) and the 5500 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 695 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 1,725 kg (3,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 41% more lift (702 kg / 1,548 lb) than the John Deere 5500 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,099 kg (6,832 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 2,573 kg (5,672 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) is 20% heavier (526 kg / 1,160 lb) than the John Deere 5500 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 695 (DT) and the 5500 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 9 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 695 (DT) and the 5500 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the John Deere 5500 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5500 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5500 (USA)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1993 | 1995–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 5500 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 41% more lift (702 kg / 1,548 lb) than the John Deere 5500 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) is 20% heavier (526 kg / 1,160 lb) than the John Deere 5500 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the John Deere 5500 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5500 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 5500 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 695 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5500 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources