CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) or International Harvester Hydro 86?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 695 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 695 (DT) | Hydro 86 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 53.7 kW (72.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 53 kW (71 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 86” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 695 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 695 (DT) and the Hydro 86. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 695 (DT) and the Hydro 86. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 86” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 695 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Hydro 86. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,099 kg (6,832 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 3,704 kg (8,166 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 86” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester Hydro 86 is 20% heavier (605 kg / 1,334 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 695 (DT) and the Hydro 86. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 86” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 8 to 16 forward gears and the International Harvester Hydro 86 is stepless (CVT) — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 695 (DT) and the Hydro 86. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 86” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the International Harvester Hydro 86 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 86” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester Hydro 86 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Hydro 86. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 695” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 86” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Hydro 86 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1993 | 1976–1980 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester Hydro 86 is 20% heavier (605 kg / 1,334 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the International Harvester Hydro 86 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester Hydro 86 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Hydro 86 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 695 (DT) has 8 to 16 forward gears and the International Harvester Hydro 86 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 695 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources