CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) or Deutz-Fahr D 7207 (C)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 685 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 7207 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (20.2 L/min / 5.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 685 (DT) | D 7207 (C) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 50.7 kW (68.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 51 kW (68 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 685 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 7207 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 685 (DT) and the D 7207 (C). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 685 (DT) and the D 7207 (C). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 59.8 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 39.6 L/min (10.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) has 51% more hydraulic flow (20.2 L/min / 5.3 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr D 7207 (C) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,380 kg (5,247 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,647 kg (5,836 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 2,920 kg (6,437 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr D 7207 (C) is 10% heavier (273 kg / 602 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 685 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 685 (DT) and the D 7207 (C). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 7207 (C). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 7207” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1990 | 1980–1984 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) has 51% more hydraulic flow (20.2 L/min / 5.3 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr D 7207 (C) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr D 7207 (C) is 10% heavier (273 kg / 602 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 685 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 7207 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources