CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) or Leyland 262?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds and drive.
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 585 (DT) | 262 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.8 kW (52.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | 39.0 kW (52.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 585 (DT) and the 262. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 585 (DT) and the 262. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 31.3 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 585 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | 1,876 kg (4,136 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,558 kg (5,639 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | 3,050 kg (6,724 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 262 is 19% heavier (492 kg / 1,085 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 585 (DT) and the 262. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | 9 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 585 (DT) and the 262. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Leyland 262 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 585” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 262 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1990 | 1975–1980 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Leyland 262 is 19% heavier (492 kg / 1,085 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Leyland 262 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 262 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 585 (DT) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources