CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 254 S (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) is ahead on top speed.

  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 254 S (A), with the call on each
Question485 (DT)MF 254 S (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.6 kW (41.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”30.4 kW (40.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 485 (DT) and the MF 254 S (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 485 (DT) and the MF 254 S (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.0 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 485 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,560 kg (3,439 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”1,662 kg (3,664 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,358 kg (5,199 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”2,620 kg (5,776 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 254 S (A) is 11% heavier (262 kg / 578 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 485 (DT) and the MF 254 S (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 485 (DT) and the MF 254 S (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 254 S (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 254 S (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 254 (S)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19901982–1987EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 254 S (A) is 11% heavier (262 kg / 578 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 254 S (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources