Case-IH Puma 210 vs Massey Ferguson MF 8260 A

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1999–2002

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 210 and the MF 8260 A → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 210 and Massey Ferguson MF 8260 A, field by field
Field	Puma 210	MF 8260 A	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	210.1 hp	207.3 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	VALMET 634 DSBAE	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	7.37 L	+9% MF 8260 A
Maximum torque declared	622 lb·ft · 843 N·m	628 lb·ft · 852 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Electro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New-Holland multi-disc driving clutch	Pedal operated hydraulic FUNK multi-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	—	33.1 gpm · 125.2 L/min	—
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	3,205 psi · 221 bar	+16% MF 8260 A
Three-point lift at ends declared	23,060 lb · 10,460 kg	22,931 lb · 10,401 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	18,078 lb · 8,200 kg	17,990 lb · 8,160 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	121.5 in · 3,087 mm	+7% MF 8260 A
Length declared	201.2 in · 5,110 mm	206.3 in · 5,240 mm	—
Width declared	84.1 in · 2,135 mm	99.1 in · 2,518 mm	+18% MF 8260 A
Height declared	120.1 in · 3,050 mm	120.8 in · 3,068 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	17.7 in · 450 mm	16.7 in · 425 mm	+6% Puma 210
Fuel tank declared	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	433.2 qt · 410 L	—

Source

Source