7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneCase-IH Puma 2102007–2011No measured PTO figureTractor twoMassey Ferguson MF 6499 A2004–2011No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 210 and the MF 6499 A → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

7 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 210 and Massey Ferguson MF 6499 A, field by field
Field	Puma 210	MF 6499 A	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	210.1 hp	212.1 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	SISU-Power 74.286 ETA	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	7.37 L	+10% MF 6499 A
Maximum torque declared	622 lb·ft · 843 N·m	641 lb·ft · 869 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Electro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New-Holland multi-disc driving clutch	Electro-hydraulically operated wet VALEO multi-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	2,176 psi · 150 bar	+27% Puma 210
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/1000 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	18,078 lb · 8,200 kg	17,328 lb · 7,860 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	118.0 in · 2,996 mm	—
Length declared	201.2 in · 5,110 mm	199.5 in · 5,068 mm	—
Width declared	84.1–133.7 in · 2,135–3,395 mm	77.8–100.4 in · 1,976–2,550 mm	differs
Height, over the cab declared	120.1 in · 3,050 mm	121.9 in · 3,096 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	17.7 in · 450 mm	20.3 in · 515 mm	+14% MF 6499 A
Fuel tank declared	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	412.1 qt · 390.0 L	—

Source

Source