10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneCase-IH Puma 1802007–2011No measured PTO figureTractor twoMassey Ferguson MF 8150 A1995–1999No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 180 and the MF 8150 A → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 180 and Massey Ferguson MF 8150 A, field by field
Field	Puma 180	MF 8150 A	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	179.6 hp	177.7 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	VALMET 620 DS	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	6.60 L	—
Maximum torque declared	592 lb·ft · 802 N·m	479 lb·ft · 649 N·m	+24% Puma 180
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Pedal-operated dry VALEO double clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	35.9 gpm · 135.8 L/min	14.1 gpm · 53.3 L/min	+155% Puma 180
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	2,901 psi · 200 bar	+5% MF 8150 A
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	18,034 lb · 8,180 kg	14,815 lb · 6,720 kg	+22% Puma 180
Maximum permissible mass declared	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	25,353 lb · 11,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	115.7 in · 2,940 mm	—
Length declared	193.5 in · 4,916 mm	198.3 in · 5,038 mm	—
Width declared	85.2–114.2 in · 2,165–2,900 mm	83.5–103.7 in · 2,120–2,633 mm	differs
Height, over the cab declared	119.7 in · 3,040 mm	119.4 in · 3,034 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.7 in · 400 mm	18.2 in · 463 mm	+16% MF 8150 A
Fuel tank declared	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	285.3 qt · 270.0 L	+52% Puma 180

Source

Source