Case-IH Puma 180 vs Massey Ferguson MF 8150 A

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1995–1999

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 180 and the MF 8150 A → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 180 and Massey Ferguson MF 8150 A, field by field
Field	Puma 180	MF 8150 A	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	179.6 hp	177.7 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	VALMET 620 DS	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	6.60 L	—
Maximum torque declared	592 lb·ft · 802 N·m	479 lb·ft · 649 N·m	+24% Puma 180
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Pedal-operated dry VALEO double clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	35.9 gpm · 135.8 L/min	14.1 gpm · 53.3 L/min	+155% Puma 180
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	2,901 psi · 200 bar	+5% MF 8150 A
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	12,434 lb · 5,640 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	18,034 lb · 8,180 kg	14,815 lb · 6,720 kg	+22% Puma 180
Maximum permissible mass declared	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	25,353 lb · 11,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	115.7 in · 2,940 mm	—
Length declared	193.5 in · 4,916 mm	198.3 in · 5,038 mm	—
Width declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	83.5 in · 2,120 mm	—
Height declared	119.7 in · 3,040 mm	119.4 in · 3,034 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.7 in · 400 mm	18.2 in · 463 mm	+16% MF 8150 A
Fuel tank declared	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	285.3 qt · 270.0 L	+52% Puma 180

Source

Source