6 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneCase-IH Puma 1652007–2011No measured PTO figureTractor twoMassey Ferguson MF 74852004–2012No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 165 and the MF 7485 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

6 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 165 and Massey Ferguson MF 7485, field by field
FieldPuma 165MF 7485Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed164.7 hp162.8 hp—
Engine declared—SISU-Power 66.253 ETA—
Displacement declared—6.60 L—
Maximum torque declared540 lb·ft · 731.8 N·m462 lb·ft · 626 N·m+17% Puma 165
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h—
Clutch declaredelectrohydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-plate driving clutch——
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredClosed centre——
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensingLoad sensing—
Pump flow declared39.1 gpm · 148.1 L/min32.2 gpm · 122.0 L/min+21% Puma 165
Pressure declared2,756 psi · 190 bar——
Rear PTO speeds declared540E/1000 rpm540 rpm / 1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared17,891 lb · 8,115 kg15,146 lb · 6,870 kg+18% Puma 165
Maximum permissible mass declared26,455 lb · 12,000 kg26,455 lb · 12,000 kg—
Wheelbase declared113.5 in · 2,884 mm118.4 in · 3,007 mm—
Length declared193.5 in · 4,916 mm198.4 in · 5,040 mm—
Width declared85.2–114.2 in · 2,165–2,900 mm99.6 in · 2,530 mmdiffers
Height, over the cab declared119.7 in · 3,040 mm122.0 in · 3,100 mm—
Ground clearance declared18.7 in · 475 mm18.9 in · 480 mm—
Fuel tank declared433.2 qt · 410.0 L401.5 qt · 380.0 L+8% Puma 165

Case-IH Puma 165 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 165”
  • Source: OECD test report 2410, 2008

Massey Ferguson MF 7485 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 7485”