Case-IH Puma 140 vs Renault Ares 696 RZ

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2001–2005

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 140 and the Ares 696 RZ → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 140 and Renault Ares 696 RZ, field by field
Field	Puma 140	Ares 696 RZ	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	140.0 hp	138 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	JOHN DEERE 6068 TRT 55 or 6068 TRT 72	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	6.79 L	—
Maximum torque declared	441 lb·ft · 598 N·m	411 lb·ft · 556.6 N·m	+7% Puma 140
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Closed centre	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	30.5 gpm · 115.6 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	2,466 psi · 170 bar	2,828 psi · 195 bar	+15% Ares 696 RZ
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	19,048 lb · 8,640 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000/540E/1000E rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	13,889 lb · 6,300 kg	13,305 lb · 6,035 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	20,393 lb · 9,250 kg	+14% Puma 140
Wheelbase declared	109.8 in · 2,789 mm	108.3 in · 2,750 mm	—
Length declared	175.2 in · 4,449 mm	242.1 in · 6,150 mm	+38% Ares 696 RZ
Width declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	100.4 in · 2,550 mm	+18% Ares 696 RZ
Height declared	117.5 in · 2,985 mm	115.9 in · 2,945 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	18.7 in · 475 mm	20.1 in · 510 mm	+7% Ares 696 RZ
Turning radius, braked declared	—	14.9 ft · 4.53 m	—
Fuel tank declared	317.0 qt · 300.0 L	232.5 qt · 220.0 L	+36% Puma 140

Source

Source