Case-IH Puma 140 vs New Holland T 6070 Elite

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2008–2012

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 140 and the T 6070 Elite → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 140 and New Holland T 6070 Elite, field by field
Field	Puma 140	T 6070 Elite	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	140.0 hp	139.1 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	IVECO-NEF 667 TA/EEL	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	6.73 L	—
Maximum torque declared	441 lb·ft · 598 N·m	426 lb·ft · 578 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	30.5 gpm · 115.6 L/min	27.5 gpm · 104.0 L/min	+11% Puma 140
Pressure declared	2,466 psi · 170 bar	3,046 psi · 210 bar	+24% T 6070 Elite
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	17,337 lb · 7,864 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	13,889 lb · 6,300 kg	12,346 lb · 5,600 kg	+13% Puma 140
Maximum permissible mass declared	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	19,842 lb · 9,000 kg	+17% Puma 140
Wheelbase declared	109.8 in · 2,789 mm	104.4 in · 2,652 mm	—
Length declared	175.2 in · 4,449 mm	190.0 in · 4,825 mm	+8% T 6070 Elite
Width declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	—
Height declared	117.5 in · 2,985 mm	117.9 in · 2,995 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	18.7 in · 475 mm	18.1 in · 460 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	317.0 qt · 300.0 L	243.0–264.2 qt · 230.0–250.0 L	differs

Source

Source