Case-IH Puma 140 vs Claas Ares 697 ATZ
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the Puma 140 and the Ares 697 ATZ → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Puma 140 | Ares 697 ATZ | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 140.0 hp | 138 hp | — |
| Engine declared | IVECO-NEF 667 TA | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 6.73 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 441 lb·ft · 598 N·m | 436 lb·ft · 591 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Closed centre | — |
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | — | — |
| Pump flow declared | 30.5 gpm · 115.6 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 2,466 psi · 170 bar | 2,901 psi · 200 bar | +18% Ares 697 ATZ |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 13,889 lb · 6,300 kg | 12,412 lb · 5,630 kg | +12% Puma 140 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 23,149 lb · 10,500 kg | 20,393 lb · 9,250 kg | +14% Puma 140 |
| Wheelbase declared | 109.8 in · 2,789 mm | 111.0 in · 2,820 mm | — |
| Length declared | 175.2 in · 4,449 mm | 203.1 in · 5,160 mm | +16% Ares 697 ATZ |
| Width declared | 85.2 in · 2,165 mm | 100.4 in · 2,550 mm | +18% Ares 697 ATZ |
| Height declared | 117.5 in · 2,985 mm | 118.5 in · 3,010 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.7 in · 475 mm | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 317.0 qt · 300.0 L | 264.2 qt · 250 L | +20% Puma 140 |
Case-IH Puma 140 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 140”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6050 Elite”
Claas Ares 697 ATZ sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Ares 697 ATZ”
- Source: OECD test report 2295, 2005