Case-IH Puma 125 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Puma 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH Puma 125 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Puma 125 | Agrotron 130 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 93.4 kW (125.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | 94.2 kW (126.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Puma 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Puma 125 and the Agrotron 130. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Puma 125 and the Agrotron 130. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 104.9 L/min (27.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | 83.0 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | AheadThe Case-IH Puma 125 has 26% more hydraulic flow (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,782 kg (10,543 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | 9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 has 93% more lift (4,458 kg / 9,828 lb) than the Case-IH Puma 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,015 kg (13,261 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | 5,710 kg (12,588 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | AheadThe Case-IH Puma 125 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 19Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 has 26% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Case-IH Puma 125 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Puma 125 and the Agrotron 130. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2470, 2009 | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125”; OECD test report 2470, 2009 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2007–2010 | 2003–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH Puma 125 has 26% more hydraulic flow (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 has 93% more lift (4,458 kg / 9,828 lb) than the Case-IH Puma 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Puma 125 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 has 26% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Case-IH Puma 125 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Puma 125 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources