Case-IH MXM 120 or Fendt Favorit 712 Vario?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MXM 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 712 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Case-IH MXM 120 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 55% (43.0 L/min / 11.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fendt Favorit 712 Vario suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 25% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MXM 120 and Fendt Favorit 712 Vario, with the call on each
QuestionMXM 120Favorit 712 VarioCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?91.2 kW (122.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”91.5 kW (122.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXM 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 712 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXM 120 and the Favorit 712 Vario.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MXM 120 and the Favorit 712 Vario.
Which pumps more oil for implements?121.5 L/min (32.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”78.5 L/min (20.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”AheadThe Case-IH MXM 120 has 55% more hydraulic flow (43.0 L/min / 11.4 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 712 Vario (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,770 kg (14,925 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Favorit 712 Vario.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,441 kg (11,995 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”5,700 kg (12,566 lb) to 6,170 kg (13,603 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 712 Vario has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 120 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 28 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH MXM 120 has 18 to 28 forward gears and the Fendt Favorit 712 Vario is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXM 120 and the Favorit 712 Vario.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 712 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Case-IH MXM 120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the Favorit 712 Vario.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 712 Vario.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”; OECD test report 2086, 20034WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 712 Vario”; OECD test report 1943, 2000EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20071999–EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH MXM 120 has 55% more hydraulic flow (43.0 L/min / 11.4 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 712 Vario (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 712 Vario has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 120 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 712 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Case-IH MXM 120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH MXM 120 has 18 to 28 forward gears and the Fendt Favorit 712 Vario is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXM 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 712 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the Favorit 712 Vario.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources