Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum or Ford 8730?
Which should you choose?
The figures split: the Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum is ahead on hydraulic flow and top speed; the Ford 8730 is ahead on maximum permissible mass.
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MXM 155 Maxxum | 8730 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.6 kW (133.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 99.2 kW (133.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXM 155 Maxxum and the 8730. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MXM 155 Maxxum and the 8730. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 120.3 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 107.1 L/min (28.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | AheadThe Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 12% more hydraulic flow (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Ford 8730 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,138 kg (15,737 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,320 kg (13,933 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 6,740 kg (14,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 11,400 kg (25,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | AheadThe Ford 8730 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXM 155 Maxxum and the 8730. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | AheadThe Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford 8730 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2007 | 1989–1994 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 12% more hydraulic flow (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Ford 8730 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 8730 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford 8730 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources