Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum vs Ford 8730
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the MXM 155 Maxxum and the 8730 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | MXM 155 Maxxum | 8730 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 153 hp | 151.9 hp | — |
| Engine declared | IVECO 675 TA/HA | Ford 401 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 7.48 L | 6.58 L | +14% MXM 155 Maxxum |
| Maximum torque declared | 462 lb·ft · 627 N·m | 387 lb·ft · 525 N·m | +19% MXM 155 Maxxum |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | — | — |
| Pump flow declared | 31.8 gpm · 120.3 L/min | 28.3 gpm · 107.1 L/min | +12% MXM 155 Maxxum |
| Pressure declared | 2,466 psi · 170 bar | 2,045 psi · 141 bar | +21% MXM 155 Maxxum |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 15,737 lb · 7,138 kg | 14,991 lb · 6,800 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540E/540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 13,933 lb · 6,320 kg | 14,859 lb · 6,740 kg | +7% 8730 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 22,046 lb · 10,000 kg | 25,133 lb · 11,400 kg | +14% 8730 |
| Wheelbase declared | 107.2 in · 2,723 mm | 110.8 in · 2,814 mm | — |
| Length declared | 184.7 in · 4,692 mm | 193.4 in · 4,913 mm | — |
| Width declared | 92.5 in · 2,350 mm | 104.5 in · 2,655 mm | +13% 8730 |
| Height declared | 118.0 in · 2,997 mm | 114.1 in · 2,898 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.4 in · 390 mm | 18.2 in · 462 mm | +18% 8730 |
| Fuel tank declared | 301.2 qt · 285.0 L | 400.5 qt · 379.0 L | +33% 8730 |
Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155”
Ford 8730 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”