Case-IH MX 80 C or Renault 95-12 RS?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH MX 80 C: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on drive.
- The Case-IH MX 80 C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 119% (51.9 L/min / 13.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH MX 80 C suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 27% (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MX 80 C | 95-12 RS | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 50.0 kW (67.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 49.9 kW (66.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 80 C and the 95-12 RS. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 80 C and the 95-12 RS. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 95.6 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 43.7 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 80 C has 119% more hydraulic flow (51.9 L/min / 13.7 gpm) than the Renault 95-12 RS (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,775 kg (6,118 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MX 80 C. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 3,780 kg (8,333 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 80 C is 27% heavier (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Renault 95-12 RS (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,815 kg (17,229 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 95-12 RS. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 80 C and the 95-12 RS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C”; OECD test report 1930, 2000 | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 95-12 RS R 7811” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 80 C is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 95-12 RS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2000 | 1984–1986 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 80 C is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 80 C has 119% more hydraulic flow (51.9 L/min / 13.7 gpm) than the Renault 95-12 RS (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 80 C is 27% heavier (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Renault 95-12 RS (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 80 C is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 95-12 RS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Case-IH MX 80 C is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources