Case-IH MX 80 C vs Renault 95-12 RS

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1984–1986

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MX 80 C and the 95-12 RS → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH MX 80 C and Renault 95-12 RS, field by field
Field	MX 80 C	95-12 RS	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	82.9 hp	82.9 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	MWM D 226-4	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.15 L	—
Maximum torque declared	218 lb·ft · 296 N·m	190 lb·ft · 258 N·m	+15% MX 80 C
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet Case-IH multi-disc driving clutch	Dry LuK double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	25.3 gpm · 95.6 L/min	11.5 gpm · 43.7 L/min	+119% MX 80 C
Pressure declared	3,408 psi · 235 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	6,118 lb · 2,775 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	10,582 lb · 4,800 kg	8,333 lb · 3,780 kg	+27% MX 80 C
Maximum permissible mass declared	17,229 lb · 7,815 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	95.4 in · 2,422 mm	99.1 in · 2,518 mm	—
Length declared	163.8 in · 4,160 mm	161.2 in · 4,095 mm	—
Width declared	96.7 in · 2,455 mm	79.1 in · 2,010 mm	+22% MX 80 C
Height declared	110.6 in · 2,809 mm	102.5 in · 2,604 mm	+8% MX 80 C
Ground clearance declared	13.4 in · 340 mm	14.6 in · 372 mm	+9% 95-12 RS
Turning radius, braked declared	13.6 ft · 4.15 m	13.8 ft · 4.20 m	—
Fuel tank declared	207.1 qt · 196.0 L	114.1 qt · 108.0 L	+81% MX 80 C

Source

Source