Case-IH MX 80 C or Landini 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH MX 80 C: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears.
- The Case-IH MX 80 C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 171% (60.3 L/min / 15.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MX 80 C | 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 50.0 kW (67.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 50.4 kW (67.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 80 C and the 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 80 C and the 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 95.6 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 35.3 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 80 C has 171% more hydraulic flow (60.3 L/min / 15.9 gpm) than the Landini 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MX 80 C. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 2,820 kg (6,217 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 80 C is 70% heavier (1,980 kg / 4,365 lb) than the Landini 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,815 kg (17,229 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 80 C has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Landini 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 80 C and the 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX80C”; OECD test report 1930, 2000 | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 8830 (DT)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2000 | 1983–1987 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 80 C is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 80 C has 171% more hydraulic flow (60.3 L/min / 15.9 gpm) than the Landini 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 80 C is 70% heavier (1,980 kg / 4,365 lb) than the Landini 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 80 C has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Landini 8830 (DT) TL-23 N/E (TL-23 DT/F) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 80 C is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources