Case-IH MX 230 or John Deere 8110 T?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH MX 230: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on top speed and PTO speeds.

  • The Case-IH MX 230 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
  • The Case-IH MX 230 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (25.7 L/min / 6.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 64% (3,161 kg / 6,968 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Case-IH MX 230 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MX 230 and John Deere 8110 T, with the call on each
QuestionMX 2308110 TCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?143.19 kW (192.02 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”140.4 kW (188.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 230 and the 8110 T.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 230 and the 8110 T.
Which pumps more oil for implements?146.1 L/min (38.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”120.4 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”AheadThe Case-IH MX 230 has 21% more hydraulic flow (25.7 L/min / 6.8 gpm) than the John Deere 8110 T (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,137 kg (17,939 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”4,976 kg (10,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”AheadThe Case-IH MX 230 has 64% more lift (3,161 kg / 6,968 lb) than the John Deere 8110 T (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?9,122 kg (20,111 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”10,727 kg (23,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8110 T is 18% heavier (1,605 kg / 3,538 lb) than the Case-IH MX 230 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 230 and the 8110 T.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”AheadThe Case-IH MX 230 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8110 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”AheadThe Case-IH MX 230 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8110 T does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX230”; OECD test report 2186, 2004TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T”DifferDrive differs: the Case-IH MX 230 4WD and the John Deere 8110 T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20052000–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH MX 230 has 21% more hydraulic flow (25.7 L/min / 6.8 gpm) than the John Deere 8110 T (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH MX 230 has 64% more lift (3,161 kg / 6,968 lb) than the John Deere 8110 T (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 8110 T is 18% heavier (1,605 kg / 3,538 lb) than the Case-IH MX 230 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH MX 230 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8110 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH MX 230 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8110 T does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Drive differs: the Case-IH MX 230 4WD and the John Deere 8110 T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources