Case-IH Magnum 7210 or Ford 8730?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Case-IH Magnum 7210 is ahead on forward gears.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH Magnum 7210 and Ford 8730, with the call on each
QuestionMagnum 72108730Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?98.4 kW (132.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”99.2 kW (133.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 7210 and the 8730.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 7210 and the 8730.
Which pumps more oil for implements?110 L/min (29.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”107.1 L/min (28.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,525 kg (16,590 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”6,740 kg (14,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7210 is 12% heavier (785 kg / 1,731 lb) than the Ford 8730 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,300 kg (24,912 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”11,400 kg (25,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7210 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Ford 8730 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8730.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19971989–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7210 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH Magnum 7210 is 12% heavier (785 kg / 1,731 lb) than the Ford 8730 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH Magnum 7210 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Ford 8730 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH Magnum 7210 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources