Case-IH JX 95 (A) or Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05: three-point lift. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 46% (1,635 kg / 3,605 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 95 (A) | DX 6.05 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.6 kW (81.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 60.5 kW (81.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 95 (A) and the DX 6.05. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 95 (A) and the DX 6.05. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 45.2 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 48.8 L/min (12.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,565 kg (7,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 has 46% more lift (1,635 kg / 3,605 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,080 kg (6,790 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 4,530 kg (9,987 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 is 47% heavier (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the JX 95 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 95 (A) and the DX 6.05. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 95 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 1987–1991 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX 95 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 has 46% more lift (1,635 kg / 3,605 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 is 47% heavier (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.05 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 95 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Case-IH JX 95 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources