Case-IH JX 65 (A) or VALMET 600?
Which should you choose?
The figures split: the VALMET 600 is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Case-IH JX 65 (A) is ahead on three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 65 (A) | 600 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.6 kW (47.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 36.0 kW (48.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 65 (A) and the 600. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 65 (A) and the 600. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 33.1 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 55.7 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | AheadThe VALMET 600 has 68% more hydraulic flow (22.6 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the Case-IH JX 65 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,565 kg (7,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 2,855 kg (6,294 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 65 (A) has 25% more lift (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the VALMET 600 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,726 kg (6,010 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 3,130 kg (6,900 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 600 is 15% heavier (404 kg / 891 lb) than the Case-IH JX 65 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the JX 65 (A) and the 600. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 65 (A) and the 600. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the JX 65 (A) and the 600. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX65” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 600” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 1997–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX 65 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 600 has 68% more hydraulic flow (22.6 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the Case-IH JX 65 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 65 (A) has 25% more lift (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the VALMET 600 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 600 is 15% heavier (404 kg / 891 lb) than the Case-IH JX 65 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 65 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources