Case-IH JX 1075 C or New Holland TN 75 DA/SA?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 1075 C | TN 75 DA/SA | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.5 kW (63.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 47.4 kW (63.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 63.9 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 58.9 L/min (15.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,408 kg (5,309 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,685 kg (5,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 2,365 kg (5,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX 1075 C is 14% heavier (320 kg / 705 lb) than the New Holland TN 75 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 44Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 16 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 1075 C and the TN 75 DA/SA. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C”; OECD test report 2114, 2004; OECD test report 2149, 2004 | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN75 DA/SA” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2008 | 2003–2008 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH JX 1075 C is 14% heavier (320 kg / 705 lb) than the New Holland TN 75 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources