Case-IH CX 90 vs Lamborghini R 874-90 (DT)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1989–1998

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CX 90 and the R 874-90 (DT) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 90 and Lamborghini R 874-90 (DT), field by field
Field	CX 90	R 874-90 (DT)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	88.8 hp	86.8 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	SAME 1000.4 WT	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.00 L	—
Maximum torque declared	235 lb·ft · 319 N·m	225 lb·ft · 305 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated, dry single-plate clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	17.0 gpm · 64.3 L/min	10.4 gpm · 39.5 L/min	+63% CX 90
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	1,740 psi · 120 bar	+55% CX 90
Three-point lift at ends declared	6,552 lb · 2,972 kg	6,349 lb · 2,880 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000/540E/1000E rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,168 lb · 3,705 kg	6,856 lb · 3,110 kg	+19% CX 90
Maximum permissible mass declared	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	92.8 in · 2,356 mm	94.9 in · 2,410 mm	—
Length declared	156.7 in · 3,980 mm	144.5 in · 3,670 mm	+8% CX 90
Width declared	84.6 in · 2,150 mm	81.1 in · 2,060 mm	—
Height declared	99.2 in · 2,520 mm	102.2 in · 2,595 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	20.5 in · 520 mm	+58% R 874-90 (DT)
Turning radius, braked declared	14.7 ft · 4.48 m	9.6 ft · 2.94 m	+52% CX 90
Fuel tank declared	163.8 qt · 155.0 L	116.2 qt · 110.0 L	+41% CX 90

Source

Source