Case-IH CX 90 vs Lamborghini 874-90 Turbo DT

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1986–1990

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CX 90 and the 874-90 Turbo DT → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 90 and Lamborghini 874-90 Turbo DT, field by field
Field	CX 90	874-90 Turbo DT	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	88.8 hp	86.8 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	SAME 1000.4 WT	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.00 L	—
Maximum torque declared	235 lb·ft · 319 N·m	225 lb·ft · 305 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated, dry single-plate clutch	Pedal-operated dry Lamborghini single-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	17.0 gpm · 64.3 L/min	10.4 gpm · 39.5 L/min	+63% CX 90
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	1,740 psi · 120 bar	+55% CX 90
Three-point lift at ends declared	6,552 lb · 2,972 kg	6,349 lb · 2,880 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,168 lb · 3,705 kg	6,614 lb · 3,000 kg	+24% CX 90
Maximum permissible mass declared	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	92.8 in · 2,356 mm	95.1 in · 2,415 mm	—
Length declared	156.7 in · 3,980 mm	145.2 in · 3,687 mm	+8% CX 90
Width declared	84.6 in · 2,150 mm	73.6 in · 1,870 mm	+15% CX 90
Height declared	99.2 in · 2,520 mm	100.1 in · 2,543 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	20.5 in · 520 mm	+58% 874-90 Turbo DT
Turning radius, braked declared	14.7 ft · 4.48 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	163.8 qt · 155.0 L	89.8 qt · 85.0 L	+82% CX 90

Source

Source