Case-IH CX 80 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrocompakt 90 V/F

13 material differences

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2004–2006

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CX 80 and the Agrocompakt 90 V/F → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 80 and Deutz-Fahr Agrocompakt 90 V/F, field by field
Field	CX 80	Agrocompakt 90 V/F	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	82.9 hp	81.9 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	SLH 1.000.4 WT	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.00 L	—
Maximum torque declared	225 lb·ft · 305 N·m	257 lb·ft · 348 N·m	+14% Agrocompakt 90 V/F
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	Hydraulically operated dry Borg & Beck single clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	16.1 gpm · 60.8 L/min	14.3 gpm · 54.0 L/min	+13% CX 80
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	8,543 lb · 3,875 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,664 lb · 3,930 kg	5,952 lb · 2,700 kg	+46% CX 80
Maximum permissible mass declared	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	92.8 in · 2,356 mm	80.9 in · 2,056 mm	+15% CX 80
Length declared	156.7 in · 3,980 mm	145.9 in · 3,706 mm	+7% CX 80
Width declared	82.7 in · 2,100 mm	42.1–47.2 in · 1,070–1,200 mm	differs
Height declared	99.2 in · 2,520 mm	84.7–85.5 in · 2,151–2,171 mm	differs
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	8.3–9.1 in · 210–230 mm	differs
Turning radius, braked declared	14.7 ft · 4.48 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	163.8 qt · 155.0 L	58.1 qt · 55 L	+182% CX 80

Source

Source