Case-IH CX 80 or DEUTZ-ALLIS 6080?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CX 80 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6080 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6080 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (11.1 L/min / 2.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CX 80 | 6080 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 61.8 kW (82.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | 61.8 kW (82.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 80 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6080 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CX 80 and the 6080. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CX 80 and the 6080. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.8 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | 71.9 L/min (19.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6080 has 18% more hydraulic flow (11.1 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Case-IH CX 80 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,875 kg (8,543 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | 2,041 kg (4,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the CX 80: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80”); the 6080: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,930 kg (8,664 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | 2,767 kg (6,100 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CX 80 is 42% heavier (1,163 kg / 2,564 lb) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6080 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6080. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 80. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CX 80 and the 6080. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80”; OECD test report 1896, 2000 | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2000 | 1985–1988 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CX 80 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6080 has 18% more hydraulic flow (11.1 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Case-IH CX 80 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CX 80 is 42% heavier (1,163 kg / 2,564 lb) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6080 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CX 80 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 80 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6080 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the CX 80: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80”); the 6080: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6080”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 80.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources