Case-IH CX 100 or ZETOR 11641?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR 11641: maximum permissible mass.

  • The ZETOR 11641 suits road haulage better on this data: 30% (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH CX 100 and ZETOR 11641, with the call on each
QuestionCX 10011641Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?65.0 kW (87.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”64.6 kW (86.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CX 100 and the 11641.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CX 100 and the 11641.
Which pumps more oil for implements?60.8 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”65.0 L/min (17.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,835 kg (8,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”5,415 kg (11,938 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the CX 100: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”); the 11641: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,235 kg (9,337 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”4,645 kg (10,240 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”7,800 kg (17,196 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”AheadThe ZETOR 11641 has 30% higher maximum permissible mass (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the Case-IH CX 100 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 100.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CX 100 and the 11641.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”; OECD test report 1899, 20004WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20001999–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 11641 has 30% higher maximum permissible mass (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the Case-IH CX 100 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the CX 100: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”); the 11641: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 11641 (1999-2002)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 100.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources