Case-IH CS-63 vs Steyr 964 (a)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2001–2004

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1992–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CS-63 and the 964 (a) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CS-63 and Steyr 964 (a), field by field
Field	CS-63	964 (a)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	62.2 hp	63.2 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS 903-27 T	Steyr WD 301.82 or WD 301.83	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	3.12 L	+15% 964 (a)
Maximum torque declared	176 lb·ft · 239 N·m	186 lb·ft · 252 N·m	+5% 964 (a)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Dry double clutch	Dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	8.1 gpm · 30.8 L/min	11.2 gpm · 42.3 L/min	+37% 964 (a)
Pressure declared	—	3,481 psi · 240 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	5,556 lb · 2,520 kg	6,437 lb · 2,920 kg	+16% 964 (a)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,490 lb · 2,490 kg	6,261 lb · 2,840 kg	+14% 964 (a)
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	9,921 lb · 4,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	83.3 in · 2,117 mm	87.0 in · 2,209 mm	—
Length declared	139.0 in · 3,530 mm	146.1 in · 3,710 mm	—
Width declared	74.8 in · 1,900 mm	81.5 in · 2,070 mm	+9% 964 (a)
Height declared	92.9 in · 2,360 mm	95.5 in · 2,425 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	—	17.5 in · 445 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	—	11.9 ft · 3.64 m	—
Fuel tank declared	77.1 qt · 73.0 L	66.6 qt · 63.0 L	+16% CS-63

Source

Source