Case-IH CS-63 or SAME Dorado 65 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CS-63 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Dorado 65 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The SAME Dorado 65 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (380 kg / 838 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CS-63 | Dorado 65 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 46.4 kW (62.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 46.3 kW (62.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CS-63 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Dorado 65 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CS-63 and the Dorado 65 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CS-63 and the Dorado 65 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.8 L/min (8.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Dorado 65 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,520 kg (5,556 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | AheadThe SAME Dorado 65 (DT) has 15% more lift (380 kg / 838 lb) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,490 kg (5,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the CS-63. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 16 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CS-63 and the Dorado 65 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | AheadThe Case-IH CS-63 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Dorado 65 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the CS-63. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 65” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2001–2004 | 2000–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SAME Dorado 65 (DT) has 15% more lift (380 kg / 838 lb) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS-63 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Dorado 65 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CS-63 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Dorado 65 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources