Case-IH CS-58 (A) vs Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1996–2001

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1993–2000

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CS-58 (A) and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CS-58 (A) and Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K), field by field
Field	CS-58 (A)	6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	57.3 hp	57.3 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS 903-27 T	Perkins AT 3.152-4	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	2.50 L	+8% CS-58 (A)
Maximum torque declared	155 lb·ft · 210 N·m	155 lb·ft · 210 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Dry Carraro double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	8.1 gpm · 30.8 L/min	9.9 gpm · 37.6 L/min	+22% 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)
Pressure declared	3,481 psi · 240 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+26% CS-58 (A)
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,894 lb · 2,220 kg	4,427 lb · 2,008 kg	+11% CS-58 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,203 lb · 2,360 kg	5,291 lb · 2,400 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	9,259 lb · 4,200 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	83.3 in · 2,117 mm	83.7 in · 2,126 mm	—
Length declared	139.0 in · 3,530 mm	139.4 in · 3,540 mm	—
Width declared	74.4 in · 1,890 mm	75.8 in · 1,925 mm	—
Height declared	87.8 in · 2,230 mm	93.3 in · 2,370 mm	+6% 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)
Ground clearance declared	16.1 in · 410 mm	19.3 in · 490 mm	+20% 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)
Turning radius, braked declared	—	11.7 ft · 3.57 m	—
Fuel tank declared	77.1 qt · 73.0 L	90.9 qt · 86.0 L	+18% 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)

Source

Source