Case-IH Magnum 280 or John Deere 8410 T?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Magnum 280 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8410 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH Magnum 280 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 40% (47.1 L/min / 12.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH Magnum 280 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Magnum 280 | 8410 T | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 205.2 kW (275 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280” | 198.7 kW (266.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 280 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8410 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 280 and the 8410 T. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 280 and the 8410 T. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 166 L/min (43.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280” | 118.9 L/min (31.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 280 has 40% more hydraulic flow (47.1 L/min / 12.4 gpm) than the John Deere 8410 T (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Magnum 280 and the 8410 T. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 12,900 kg (28,440 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280” | 11,965 kg (26,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Magnum 280. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 19OECD test report 2979, 2016 | 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Magnum 280 and the 8410 T. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 280 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8410 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the Magnum 280 and the 8410 T. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Magnum 280. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280”; OECD test report 2979, 2016 | TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8410T”; OECD test report 1937, 2000 | DifferDrive differs: the Case-IH Magnum 280 4WD and the John Deere 8410 T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2011 | 2000–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 280 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH Magnum 280 has 40% more hydraulic flow (47.1 L/min / 12.4 gpm) than the John Deere 8410 T (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 280 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8410 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 280 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Drive differs: the Case-IH Magnum 280 4WD and the John Deere 8410 T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 280 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8410 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the Magnum 280 and the 8410 T.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources