Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 vs Ford 8970

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1997–1999

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1993–1999

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 7250 PRO/8950 and the 8970 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 and Ford 8970, field by field
Field	7250 PRO/8950	8970	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	257 hp	236.7 hp	+9% 7250 PRO/8950
Engine declared	CUMMINS 6 TA-830	FORD/NEW HOLLAND VB 456 CID TC/AC	differs
Displacement declared	8.27 L	7.48 L	+11% 7250 PRO/8950
Maximum torque declared	771 lb·ft · 1,046 N·m	784 lb·ft · 1,063 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Oil-immersed multi-plate clutch	Wet Funk multi-plate clutch running in oil bath	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	29.7 gpm · 112.4 L/min	33.5 gpm · 126.8 L/min	+13% 8970
Pressure declared	2,451 psi · 169 bar	2,495 psi · 172 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	16,204 lb · 7,350 kg	20,238 lb · 9,180 kg	+25% 8970
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	18,338 lb · 8,318 kg	19,147 lb · 8,685 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	25,519 lb · 11,575 kg	30,093 lb · 13,650 kg	+18% 8970
Wheelbase declared	118.3 in · 3,006 mm	118.3 in · 3,005 mm	—
Length declared	200.4 in · 5,090 mm	198.3 in · 5,038 mm	—
Width declared	120.0 in · 3,048 mm	100.8 in · 2,560 mm	+19% 7250 PRO/8950
Height declared	121.1 in · 3,077 mm	122.8 in · 3,118 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	19.3 in · 489 mm	20.0 in · 509 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	379.4–470.2 qt · 359.0–445.0 L	439.6 qt · 416.0 L	differs

Source

Source