Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 or J.I. Case 4694?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7240 PRO/8940 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4694 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 91% (53.7 L/min / 14.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 and J.I. Case 4694, with the call on each
Question7240 PRO/89404694Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?175.8 kW (235.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”173.6 kW (232.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7240 PRO/8940 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4694 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7240 PRO/8940 and the 4694.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7240 PRO/8940 and the 4694.
Which pumps more oil for implements?112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”58.7 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”AheadThe Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 91% more hydraulic flow (53.7 L/min / 14.2 gpm) than the J.I. Case 4694 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,148 kg (15,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”5,780 kg (12,743 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 7240 PRO/8940: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”); the 4694: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?8,242 kg (18,170 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”10,120 kg (22,311 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 4694 is 23% heavier (1,878 kg / 4,140 lb) than the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4694.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”AheadThe Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the J.I. Case 4694 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4694.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–19991984–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 91% more hydraulic flow (53.7 L/min / 14.2 gpm) than the J.I. Case 4694 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 4694 is 23% heavier (1,878 kg / 4,140 lb) than the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the J.I. Case 4694 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7240 PRO/8940 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4694 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 7240 PRO/8940: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”); the 4694: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4694”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources