Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 or Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930: hydraulic flow and maximum permissible mass.
- The Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 111% (59.1 L/min / 15.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 suits road haulage better on this data: 29% (2,575 kg / 5,677 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7230 PRO/8930 | MF 8160 A | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 135.8 kW (182.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 133.2 kW (178.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7230 PRO/8930 and the MF 8160 A. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7230 PRO/8930 and the MF 8160 A. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 53.3 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | AheadThe Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 has 111% more hydraulic flow (59.1 L/min / 15.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,137 kg (13,530 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 5,640 kg (12,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,103 kg (17,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 6,720 kg (14,815 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 is 21% heavier (1,383 kg / 3,049 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | AheadThe Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (2,575 kg / 5,677 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 30 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 8160 A. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 7230 PRO/8930. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8160” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–1999 | 1995–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 has 111% more hydraulic flow (59.1 L/min / 15.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 is 21% heavier (1,383 kg / 3,049 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (2,575 kg / 5,677 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8160 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources