Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 or WHITE 170?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7210 PRO/8910 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 50% (1,812 kg / 3,995 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7210 PRO/8910 | 170 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 125 kW (168 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 123.6 kW (165.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 170” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7210 PRO/8910 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7210 PRO/8910 and the 170. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7210 PRO/8910 and the 170. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 112.8 L/min (29.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 170. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,425 kg (11,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 3,613 kg (7,965 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 170” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 50% more lift (1,812 kg / 3,995 lb) than the WHITE 170 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,818 kg (17,236 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 6,033 kg (13,300 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 170” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is 30% heavier (1,785 kg / 3,935 lb) than the WHITE 170 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 170. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 170” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the WHITE 170 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 170. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 170” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 170” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 170 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 170” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 170” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–1999 | 1990–1992 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 50% more lift (1,812 kg / 3,995 lb) than the WHITE 170 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is 30% heavier (1,785 kg / 3,935 lb) than the WHITE 170 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the WHITE 170 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 170 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7210 PRO/8910 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources