Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 or Steyr 8180 a?
Which should you choose?
The figures split: the Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is ahead on hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and PTO speeds; the Steyr 8180 a is ahead on three-point lift.
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 suits road haulage better on this data: 36% (3,075 kg / 6,779 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7210 PRO/8910 | 8180 a | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 102.5 kW (137.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 102.4 kW (137.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7210 PRO/8910 and the 8180 a. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7210 PRO/8910 and the 8180 a. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 112.8 L/min (29.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 52.4 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 115% more hydraulic flow (60.4 L/min / 16.0 gpm) than the Steyr 8180 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,425 kg (11,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 6,620 kg (14,595 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | AheadThe Steyr 8180 a has 22% more lift (1,195 kg / 2,635 lb) than the Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,818 kg (17,236 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 6,012 kg (13,254 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is 30% heavier (1,806 kg / 3,982 lb) than the Steyr 8180 a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 36% higher maximum permissible mass (3,075 kg / 6,779 lb) than the Steyr 8180 a (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8180 a. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 8180 a does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8180” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–1999 | 1986–1993 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 115% more hydraulic flow (60.4 L/min / 16.0 gpm) than the Steyr 8180 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 8180 a has 22% more lift (1,195 kg / 2,635 lb) than the Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is 30% heavier (1,806 kg / 3,982 lb) than the Steyr 8180 a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 36% higher maximum permissible mass (3,075 kg / 6,779 lb) than the Steyr 8180 a (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 8180 a does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources