Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910: hydraulic flow and maximum permissible mass.
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 34% (28.6 L/min / 7.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 suits road haulage better on this data: 22% (2,075 kg / 4,575 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7210 PRO/8910 | Agrotron 150 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 102.5 kW (137.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 101.3 kW (135.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7210 PRO/8910 and the Agrotron 150. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7210 PRO/8910 and the Agrotron 150. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 112.8 L/min (29.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 84.2 L/min (22.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 34% more hydraulic flow (28.6 L/min / 7.6 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,425 kg (11,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 7,388 kg (16,287 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 7210 PRO/8910: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910”); the Agrotron 150: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,818 kg (17,236 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 5,390 kg (11,883 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is 45% heavier (2,428 kg / 5,353 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | AheadThe Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 22% higher maximum permissible mass (2,075 kg / 4,575 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 150. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotron 150. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–1999 | 1997–2000 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 34% more hydraulic flow (28.6 L/min / 7.6 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 is 45% heavier (2,428 kg / 5,353 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910 has 22% higher maximum permissible mass (2,075 kg / 4,575 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 7210 PRO/8910: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210 PRO/8910”); the Agrotron 150: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources