Case-IH C 70 or SAME Mercury 85 Export (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the SAME Mercury 85 Export (DT): three-point lift.

  • The SAME Mercury 85 Export (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 57% (1,350 kg / 2,976 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH C 70 and SAME Mercury 85 Export (DT), with the call on each
QuestionC 70Mercury 85 Export (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?48.7 kW (65.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”49.0 kW (65.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the C 70 and the Mercury 85 Export (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the C 70 and the Mercury 85 Export (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.5 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”3,700 kg (8,157 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”AheadThe SAME Mercury 85 Export (DT) has 57% more lift (1,350 kg / 2,976 lb) than the Case-IH C 70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,060 kg (6,746 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”3,270 kg (7,209 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Mercury 85 Export (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the C 70 and the Mercury 85 Export (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the C 70 and the Mercury 85 Export (DT).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Mercury 85”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1992–19971981–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH C 70 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Mercury 85 Export (DT) has 57% more lift (1,350 kg / 2,976 lb) than the Case-IH C 70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH C 70 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources