Case-IH 9350 vs New Holland T 9020
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 9350 and the T 9020 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9350 | T 9020 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 306 hp | 330.4 hp | +8% T 9020 |
| Engine declared | CUMMINS MTA-11 A | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 10.82 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 1,016 lb·ft · 1,378 N·m | 1,077 lb·ft · 1,460 N·m | +6% T 9020 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Electrohydraulically-actuated, wet multi-disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 27.2 gpm · 103.0 L/min | 40.6 gpm · 153.7 L/min | +49% T 9020 |
| Pressure declared | 2,495 psi · 172 bar | 3,336 psi · 230 bar | +34% T 9020 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 15,849 lb · 7,189 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 28,722 lb · 13,028 kg | 32,296 lb · 14,649 kg | +12% T 9020 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 39,602 lb · 17,963 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 132.5 in · 3,366 mm | 154.0 in · 3,911 mm | +16% T 9020 |
| Length declared | 296.7 in · 7,535 mm | 297.6 in · 7,558 mm | — |
| Width declared | 136.9 in · 3,477 mm | 120.1 in · 3,050 mm | +14% 9350 |
| Height declared | 135.2 in · 3,434 mm | 150.3 in · 3,818 mm | +11% T 9020 |
| Ground clearance declared | 11.7 in · 297 mm | — | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 12.8 ft · 3.90 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 799.9 qt · 757.0 L | 799.9 qt · 757.0 L | — |
Case-IH 9350 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”
New Holland T 9020 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”