Case-IH 9280 vs John Deere 8960

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1990–1995

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1989–1993

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 9280 and the 8960 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH 9280 and John Deere 8960, field by field
Field	9280	8960	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	374.8 hp	365.2 hp	—
Engine declared	CUMMINS NTA-855 A	Cummins NTA 855 A 370	differs
Displacement declared	10.02 L	14.01 L	+40% 8960
Maximum torque declared	1,265 lb·ft · 1,715 N·m	1,279 lb·ft · 1,734 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Oil-immersed multi-plate driving clutch with disc diameter 228.6 mm	Pedal-operated hydraulic and oil-cooled double disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Closed centre	—
Pump flow declared	30.3 gpm · 114.7 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	2,306 psi · 159 bar	2,857–3,162 psi · 197–218 bar	differs
Three-point lift at ends declared	24,011 lb · 10,891 kg	11,795–12,125 lb · 5,350–5,500 kg	differs
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	34,674 lb · 15,728 kg	35,109 lb · 15,925 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	76.5–132.6 in · 1,943–3,368 mm	133.9 in · 3,400 mm	differs
Length declared	299.6 in · 7,610 mm	286.1 in · 7,266 mm	—
Width declared	153.1 in · 3,890 mm	152.4 in · 3,870 mm	—
Height declared	152.4 in · 3,870 mm	138.0 in · 3,505 mm	+10% 9280
Ground clearance declared	16.7 in · 424 mm	14.9 in · 378 mm	+12% 9280
Fuel tank declared	1,001.7 qt · 948.0 L	882.3 qt · 835.0 L	+14% 9280

Source

Source