Case-IH 9250 vs New Holland TJ-330
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 9250 and the TJ-330 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9250 | TJ-330 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 296.0 hp | 325.5 hp | +10% TJ-330 |
| Engine declared | CUMMINS LTA-10 | CUMMINS 6 TAA-9004 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 10.01 L | 8.85 L | +13% 9250 |
| Maximum torque declared | 977 lb·ft · 1,324 N·m | 1,077 lb·ft · 1,460 N·m | +10% TJ-330 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Oil-immersed multi-plate clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 27.8 gpm · 105.2 L/min | 40.6 gpm · 153.7 L/min | +46% TJ-330 |
| Pressure declared | 2,306 psi · 159 bar | 3,263 psi · 225 bar | +42% TJ-330 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 14,074 lb · 6,384 kg | 15,673 lb · 7,109 kg | +11% TJ-330 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 30,060 lb · 13,635 kg | 32,296 lb · 14,649 kg | +7% TJ-330 |
| Wheelbase declared | 130.0 in · 3,302 mm | 154.0 in · 3,911 mm | +18% TJ-330 |
| Length declared | 264.0 in · 6,706 mm | 297.6 in · 7,558 mm | +13% TJ-330 |
| Width declared | 119.5 in · 3,035 mm | 145.0 in · 3,683 mm | +21% TJ-330 |
| Height declared | 139.1 in · 3,532 mm | 143.0 in · 3,631 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 14.8 in · 377 mm | — | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 15.1 ft · 4.60 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 799.9 qt · 757.0 L | 799.9 qt · 757.0 L | — |
Case-IH 9250 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250”
New Holland TJ-330 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ330”